The only Hardened Arms upper that I had problems with, was their 7.62x39 upper.
It had trouble ejecting. The 7.62x39 is about .440 diameter at the base, vs. about .378 for 5.56x45.
But the ejection port on the HA 7.62x39 upper was only a 1/2 inch across - same as 5.56x45 !
And so … it had troubles cycling !
I think the 7.62x39 is one of THE BEST single calibers.
BUT it is poorly implemented … sort of. Want more muzzle velocity ? Get a 7.62x39 with a 24 inch barrel. Which will be very expensive. The longest barrel I’ve seen off the shelf is 20 inches for a 7-39.
Also the VARIETY of 308 is super helpful. Imagine if Barnes made a 165 grain 7-39 diameter bullet (303, 311, whatever it is). I can fit 33 grains of 2200 (a faster burning rifle powder) in a 6.8 SPC and it works really good. The 7-39 has a little more case capacity, and is a little more tolerant of fast-burning powders, than 6.8 SPC.
34 grains of 1680 pushing a 165 grain ? well that’s very similar to 35 grains of 4198 pushing a 165 grain Barnes.
Since I broke a 6.5 Grendel upper using only 1.7 grams of 1680, I have a lot of respect for it !
I think the best way to get 7.62x39 functionality is to buy a 308, and to simply load it with 7.62x39 size loads … sort of.
I use 35 or 35.5 grains of IMR 4198 or Reloder 7 in 308 loads.
You can fit almost that same amount of powder in a 7.62x39. AND, you can use a faster burning powder … which generates more pressure for its weight = more foot-pounds.
ALSO … the 7-39 rifle is FANTASTIC reliability wise. I have only seen it in pictures, but there’s so many people praising the historic 7-39 … it does make me curious.
How do the classic 7-39 rifles achieve their reliability ?