When I read that in the description I thought it was talking about this piece .
That piece pops out per the video above.
Ohh I missed that part , ty sir. I’m gonna order one I didn’t know if I needed another barrel too.
The FDE came out today also
Let us know what you think about it when get some play time in with it. I’m pretty sure I’ll be getting a couple myself. Thanks
i cant help myself but i think i want one of those mck’s too…i may eventually end up with one.
I ordered some accessories from the CAA/MCK website looks like there could be one for the Rock in the future.
that would be another nice mating… i could see a rock in one of those and me owning it. lol
Removed the barrel shroud & added a Kaw Valley XL slim comp on the Dagger threaded barrel.
It would not charge with the threaded barrel & MCK shroud, it hits as shown in pic.
i think that comp is meant for a PCC not a sidearm, the attachment you took off should act as a decent comp. it dose look cool tho
or possibly attach that comp to the outer attachment
you might need a non-threaded barrel but then ultimately the comp would be connected and working
seems like it’s proprietary attachments…
I just added the comp to extend the threaded barrel because the gun sits back 2-3 inches inside.
I’ll try a non threaded, the excitement over this thing has really worn off haha.
well with a glock 19 and threaded barrel you can set it to glock 17 and it works fine… tbh i have no idea how this one works but going off what i seen on glock threads
It clears set in the 17 setting, it will charge in that position.
I’ll see if I can get in the range after work tomorrow.
Is that barrel really that off center or just camera angle?
That’s what had me worried with the shroud , that pic above is with threaded barrel & pulled out 1/4 for a g17 & this is with non threaded set for at g19.
Could be my bad angle too.
Please give a range report. The muzzle device looks centered on the mold lines of the frame but that barrel sure doesn’t.
Man I’m glad I wasn’t the guinea pig on this one.
I was looking for a new gizmo, this might not be it huh?
Hopefully you get it squared away at the range ![]()
@Coolwin1776












