Did you see? Plaintiffs argue that the Final Rule unlawfully treats weapon parts kits as firearms. Plaintiffs are likely to succeed on both claims

General Discussion
1

Did you see?

  1. The Final Rule exceeds ATF’s statutory authority under the plain
    language of the Gun Control Act.
    The Administrative Procedure Act requires courts to “hold unlawful and set aside agency
    action, findings, and conclusions found to be . . . in excess of statutory jurisdiction, authority, or
    limitations.” 5 U.S.C. § 706(2)(C). Plaintiffs argue the Final Rule exceeds ATF’s statutory
    authority under the Gun Control Act in two ways. First, Plaintiffs argue that the Final Rule expands
    ATF’s authority over parts that may be “readily converted” into frames or receivers, when
    Congress limited ATF’s authority to “frames or receivers” as such. Second, Plaintiffs argue that
    the Final Rule unlawfully treats weapon parts kits as firearms. Plaintiffs are likely to succeed on
    both claims.
2

i didnt see that, im glad that you shared though. Lets hope they win this thing and that the ATF is stopped from abusing their authority like this in the future.

3

That’s often a way of a court saying "What the hell do you think you’re doing here? "
In this case the court would be asking the ATF