Another one to add to the ignore list.
I would argue democrats win because people expect others or companies to do their own legwork…as evidenced in this thread.
2 Likes
Others and companies don’t create LAW there smart guy.
And I just be a supportive and donate like I have even if it was the other way around.
Yet you want them to pay for your state electing democrats?
You must be reading between the lines. I specifically said if “they shouldn’t preach the second amendment if they aren’t willing to help fight for it.” “Regardless of where the fighting is.”
Hey Palmetto you should send me back the money I’ve spent on product from your company so I can help the good folk here in Washington state.
Help take the fight to the United States Supreme Court. Have them actually rule on it and all this would be over with. They would be more willing to if we had less people saying move to a different state that’s more pro second amendment and actually standing together.
They have invested $100mil in an ammo plant for citizens only (no govt contracts). They fought the ATF and won re: braces. They currently are having to fight Shield Arms re: micro mags. They have armed more people (IMO) than the majority of other gun companies.
And you cry about a single state? Excuse me while i dont shed a tear…
1 Like
Haha you act like they fought that ATF fight alone. Read back on what you said a few comments ago. “ Pallmetto isn’t a law office.”
Never used the word “alone”. Please dont put words in my mouth. As far as the Supreme Court that you referenced, in order to get there the case would have to go through the 9th Circuit (or Circus as its often called). It is the most anti-gun of all the court circuits. Good luck making it past them. While not a complete 100% chance of losing, the 9th is up there.
1 Like
I’m locking this. Dead horse being beat.
5 Likes